🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive a decisive European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and then bin them for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.